Is Goldstein Stealing from PSC Members to Pay Petraeus’s Bloated Salary?
While the details of
Petraeus’s hiring remain sketchy, a real issue has emerged about the source of
his $150-200,000 salary, itself supplemented with teaching assistants and
research support. The information provided in the documents obtained by Gawker
raise more questions than they answer. The latest information is from an apparent
letter or email dated July 1st from the Macaulay Dean, Ann Kirschner, posted
by CUNY in response to the Gawker article, and possibly
communicated before that date. This document claims that the salary will
only be $150,000, part of which will be donated to veterans. How much? No one
will say. It goes on to state that:
Chancellor Matthew Goldstein
has provided private funding for your position, which will be paid through the
CUNY Research Foundation.
How do we know, however, that
the Chancellor has secured the private donations to cover all of the expenses
associated with this hire?
For years the Research
Foundation (RF), a private entity not directly under state control, has been
used as a kind of administrative slush fund with no public accountability. Its
main function is to process grants received by faculty from agencies and
foundations like the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of
Health, and Ford Foundation. Part of the grant money the Research Foundation
processes directly pays for research costs such as lab equipment or research
assistants, but a significant portion of the grant money also covers
institutional “overhead” to cover the infrastructure costs associated with
being a research university such as lab space, basic computers, and utilities.
Not all of this overhead,
however, goes directly to support the projects that generate it. Some gets
diverted to less well funded faculty research endeavors, while some supports
administrative initiatives, which may have nothing to do with research, such as
supplementing administrative staff, fundraising, etc. How exactly the money is
used is often not clear.
That is because the Research
Foundation is a separate private entity, which has resisted being subject to
the same disclosure rules as the university itself. The RF has refused to abide
by the Freedom of Information laws used by Gawker to develop this story.
The PSC has responded by
promoting a bill in Albany to force the Research Foundations at CUNY and SUNY
to open the books and subject themselves to public scrutiny. The main
opponent of these efforts has been Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, whose Chief
of Staff has ties to the Nanotech Center at SUNY Albany funded through the SUNY
Research Foundation.
Because of the continued
secrecy of RF finances, it is impossible to know whether Goldstein really
raised the entire $150,000 plus perks from private donors or whether he
diverted money from one of his slush funds at the Research Foundation. Faculty
need to be assured that the grant money they work so hard to raise isn’t being
used to fund the outsized salary of a single, well-connected adjunct teaching
only one small seminar.
Faculty, though, are
not the only ones potentially being shortchanged by this. The PSC also
represents many employees at the Research Foundation, who are involved in a
bitter contract dispute. According
to the Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY):
On
the same day that news broke of CUNY’s plans to pay Petraeus $150,000 via the
CUNY Research Foundation, employees represented by the PSC were on a one-day
strike outside the Foundation’s central office. They have been without a
contract for six months, and the Foundation management is offering below
inflation salary increases, demanding excessive concessions for new hires and
increasing heath care costs for employees.
Over
a hundred research Foundation workers and their supporters took part in the
walk out, including Anthony Dixon, chair of the Professional Staff Congress
chapter at the Research Foundation's central office.
“That $150,000 for
Petraeus is almost enough to cover a 3% salary increase for our entire
bargaining unit,” said Dixon.
Wherever
the money is coming from the hiring of Petraeus is a bad decision. It’s a slap
in the face to low-paid adjuncts struggling to survive on $3,000 a course. It’s
a poke in the eye to RF staff who’ve gone months without a contract, and an
insult to the grant-winning efforts of faculty and to the fundamental mission
of the university.
We
demand that the CUNY Board of Trustees reject the hiring of Petraeus under the
conditions publicly laid out by Dean Kirschner and the Chancellor. We call on
acting Chancellor Bill Kelly to divert any donated funds to more fruitful
purposes. We urge the NY State Legislature to pass the CUNY and SUNY RF
Transparency Bill to insure greater public accountability for these vast
secretive institutions. Finally, we invite everyone to sign the petition opposing Petraeus’s hire written by City
Councilmember Brad Lander and circulated by MoveOn.org.
According to Assembly Member Lalor in an editorial in the Daily News, no donations have come in for Petraeus, meaning the money will in fact come directly out of the Research Foundation.
ReplyDelete