What Does BC Receive in the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act?

Of the $455 Million in Federal funds to CUNY in the CRRSAA - the followup to the CARES Act - BC receives $31.2 Million. Of this total, $8.8 Million must be spent on direct aid to students, leaving $22.4 Million useable to cover "lost revenue, reimbursement for expenses already incurred, technology costs associated with a transition to distance education, faculty and staff trainings, and payroll.” 

Amounts below were determined by the number of Pell grant recipients at each college. 

Institution Name

Total Award

Minimum Amount for Student Aid Portion (CFDA 84.425E Allocation)

Maximum Amount for Portion (CFDA 84.425F Allocation)

CUNY Brooklyn College

$31,206,205

$8,813,665

$22,392,540

City College of New York ‐ CUNY

$27,101,618

$7,699,953

$19,401,665

CUNY Hunter College

$33,557,126

$9,503,479

$24,053,647

CUNY Queens College

$29,491,179

$8,368,399

$21,122,780

CUNY Borough of Manhattan Community College

$55,218,492

$13,210,414

$42,008,078

CUNY Bronx Community College

$21,655,807

$4,829,313

$16,826,494

CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice

$27,635,844

$7,660,005

$19,975,839

Kingsborough Commmunity College/CUNY

$22,157,742

$5,078,261

$17,079,481

New York City College of Technology of the City Unive

$30,860,066

$8,104,664

$22,755,402

Queensborough Community College‐CUNY

$23,701,583

$5,660,540

$18,041,043

College of Staten Island/CUNY

$22,565,946

$6,297,978

$16,267,968

CUNY York College

$14,007,349

$3,602,707

$10,404,642

CUNY Graduate School & University Center

$1,877,959

$388,067

$1,489,892

CUNY Lehman College

$25,866,919

$6,646,548

$19,220,371

CUNY Bernard M. Baruch College

$28,496,963

$8,281,613

$20,215,350

CUNY, Hostos Community College

$16,037,693

$3,633,715

$12,403,978

CUNY LaGuardia Community College Public

$27,737,337

$6,458,616

$21,278,721

CUNY Medgar Evers College

$13,615,664

$3,554,719

$10,060,945

CUNY School of Law '(The)'

$225,396

$70,998

$154,398

Stella and Charles Guttman Community College

$2,231,778

$614,176

$1,617,602

 

$455,248,666

$118,477,830

$336,770,836


Comments

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated just to make sure they are not spam! We aim to review and publish within 24 hours.

Popular posts from this blog

CUNY First Computer System to Aid Administrative Control over Colleges at the Expense of Efficiency and Effectiveness

Guest Post   Every once in a while I get a question, either privately or in a department meeting, regarding CUNYFirst. Here is what I know of CUNYFirst, based on a few years of working with the project as a "training liaison" (which is a fancy term for room-scheduler). (1) The idea of CUNYFirst is a good one: to have a unified, integrated "enterprise"-scale system that encompasses all university/campus business processes. Such a system could, in principle at least, have saved a lot of expenditure on maintaining dozens of disparate, redundant, barely cooperating third-party systems. Such a system could have offered information access that would have benefited the administration, the staff, the faculty, and students. (2) CUNY Central's motives in pursuing CUNYFirst were dominated by an agenda that has nothing to do with such benefits however. Rather, CUNY Central sought absolute control over all college activity, including curriculum. Think of it: whoev
Read more

CHAPTER LETTER CAMPAIGN: to President Michelle Anderson

Image
In the Fall of 2023, we asked all departments or units to write and sign letters to the college President, Michelle Anderson. We wanted her to know what our colleagues do well. We wanted her to hear our vision for work and mission at Brooklyn College. We wanted her to understand what we all need to thrive. We wanted to model a mission-driven discourse, not a workplace lead by austerity.  We wanted our President to hear us. Professor Naomi Braine reads the Sociology Dept Letter Professor Jillian Cavanaugh reads the Anthropology Letter     Twelve letters, signed by 100s of our colleagues were submitted—although many more were penned (many felt uneasy about being visible in this way). 1) Synthesis letter signed by over 80 faculty and staff 2) Sociology Department , 26 signatures 3) Anthropology Department, 16 signatures 4) Accounting Department , 14 signatures 5) Library , 28 signatures 6) PRLS , 6 signatures 7) Psychology Department , 30 signatures 8) English Department , over 100 signat
Read more

93% Vote No Confidence in Pathways

The referendum votes have been tallied: a total of 4,322 votes were cast, out of a total number of 7,202 possible votes: a 60% turnout. Of those, 3,996 full-time faculty agreed that they have No Confidence in Pathways, with only 323 voting Disagree (and 3 void ballots). An absolute majority of the full-time faculty are on record as having no confidence in Pathways. That is a stunning rebuke to the new curriculum and the coercive process used to implement it. I will send a longer message to the entire membership shortly, but for now I want to congratulate you all on your extraordinary collective effort in defense of our students' right to a rigorous education. Equipped with this result, we can take the campaign to a new level in the fall. In solidarity, Barbara Bowen
Read more