CUNY Board to Give Chancelor Golden Parachute

CUNY boss’ $weet goodbye


By SUSAN EDELMAN
NY Post
April 21, 2013
 
 
CUNY is planning a golden parachute for Chancellor Matthew Goldstein.
 
Goldstein, 71, who announced last week he will retire in June, will be offered an undetermined salary for activities such as teaching a graduate math class, fund-raising or helping with special projects, said Benno Schmidt, chairman of the CUNY Board of Trustees.
 
“We’ll craft a special package for Matt,” Schmidt told The Post. “We definitely want him to stick around and be active. He’s in very good health and in a position to make a good contribution.”
 
Schmidt said the salary — the first for a retired CUNY chancellor — has not yet been decided.
 
 
“I expect to discuss it with Matt probably in the next few weeks and take some set of recommendations to the board, probably in our May or June meeting,” he said.
 
 
In a move seemingly tailored to Goldstein, the CUNY trustees in November 2011 added the title “chancellor emeritus” to its executive compensation plan, allowing the board to appoint a departing chancellor to a five-year stint.
 
Goldstein, a former math professor and president of Baruch College, currently gets $490,000 a year in salary, plus a $90,000 housing allowance.
Schmidt said the post-retirement salary would be less, but the board is “going to want to be on the generous side.”
 
“I think he’s been underpaid as chancellor, The board has wanted to give him raises. He has repeatedly refused raises.”
Goldstein’s salary ranked No. 68 among public college presidents nationwide, according to a 2011 Chronicle of Higher Education survey.

 
But Goldstein has other income. While chancellor, he has served since 2003 as a funds trustee at JPMorgan Chase & Co., which paid him $325,000 in 2011. Last December, the board overseeing mutual funds elected Goldstein its new chairman, a post that paid his predecessor $500,000 in 2011.
 
 
He is also entitled to a New York state pension.
 
 
Schmidt acknowledged that Goldstein’s post-retirement pay is likely to stir controversy among students and faculty members amid tuition hikes and budget cuts, but said private funds may subsidize the salary.

___________________________________

Please feel free to comment below as well as "like" and retweet.

Comments

  1. BC PSCApril 21, 2013 at 4:28 PM

    Let's see how the chancellor gets paid for adjuncting a math class, compared to our other 10,000+ adjuncts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BC PSCApril 21, 2013 at 5:24 PM

    Thanks to Corey Robin for reposting with commentary:

    http://coreyrobin.com/2013/04/21/god-bless-benno-schmidt/?utm_source=feedly

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownApril 21, 2013 at 8:07 PM

    One of the lessons when I teach stratification is how members of the elite are socialized into believing that they deserve extraordinary privilege. So the chair of the CUNY Board can say without irony that the Chancellor is underpaid and needs to be taken care of. Benno acknowledges that this might be "controversial" but what is left unsaid is he thinks it is because faculty, staff, and students just don't see how deserving Goldstein is. That kind of class solidarity doesn't happen by accident; you need a lot of people telling you how great you are, over and over, so that you start to believe it yourself.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated just to make sure they are not spam! We aim to review and publish within 24 hours.

Popular posts from this blog

CUNY First Computer System to Aid Administrative Control over Colleges at the Expense of Efficiency and Effectiveness

Guest Post   Every once in a while I get a question, either privately or in a department meeting, regarding CUNYFirst. Here is what I know of CUNYFirst, based on a few years of working with the project as a "training liaison" (which is a fancy term for room-scheduler). (1) The idea of CUNYFirst is a good one: to have a unified, integrated "enterprise"-scale system that encompasses all university/campus business processes. Such a system could, in principle at least, have saved a lot of expenditure on maintaining dozens of disparate, redundant, barely cooperating third-party systems. Such a system could have offered information access that would have benefited the administration, the staff, the faculty, and students. (2) CUNY Central's motives in pursuing CUNYFirst were dominated by an agenda that has nothing to do with such benefits however. Rather, CUNY Central sought absolute control over all college activity, including curriculum. Think of it: whoev
Read more

CHAPTER LETTER CAMPAIGN: to President Michelle Anderson

Image
In the Fall of 2023, we asked all departments or units to write and sign letters to the college President, Michelle Anderson. We wanted her to know what our colleagues do well. We wanted her to hear our vision for work and mission at Brooklyn College. We wanted her to understand what we all need to thrive. We wanted to model a mission-driven discourse, not a workplace lead by austerity.  We wanted our President to hear us. Professor Naomi Braine reads the Sociology Dept Letter Professor Jillian Cavanaugh reads the Anthropology Letter     Twelve letters, signed by 100s of our colleagues were submitted—although many more were penned (many felt uneasy about being visible in this way). 1) Synthesis letter signed by over 80 faculty and staff 2) Sociology Department , 26 signatures 3) Anthropology Department, 16 signatures 4) Accounting Department , 14 signatures 5) Library , 28 signatures 6) PRLS , 6 signatures 7) Psychology Department , 30 signatures 8) English Department , over 100 signat
Read more

93% Vote No Confidence in Pathways

The referendum votes have been tallied: a total of 4,322 votes were cast, out of a total number of 7,202 possible votes: a 60% turnout. Of those, 3,996 full-time faculty agreed that they have No Confidence in Pathways, with only 323 voting Disagree (and 3 void ballots). An absolute majority of the full-time faculty are on record as having no confidence in Pathways. That is a stunning rebuke to the new curriculum and the coercive process used to implement it. I will send a longer message to the entire membership shortly, but for now I want to congratulate you all on your extraordinary collective effort in defense of our students' right to a rigorous education. Equipped with this result, we can take the campaign to a new level in the fall. In solidarity, Barbara Bowen
Read more