Initial Victory--Boycott Bill "Taken off the Agenda"

Our calls worked!  This afternoon at the Assembly Higher Education Committee meeting, Chairperson Deborah Glick took A. 8392, the anti-academic freedom bill,  off the agenda.  That is a huge victory for all of us who called and wrote to Deborah Glick, Speaker Sheldon Silver and other representatives.  It’s also a huge victory for the students of New York State.  Congratulations on your eloquence and persistence.  Steve London and I both talked to several lawmakers today, and the report was that they were being inundated with calls and emails in opposition.  The action was clearly in response to our calls and the calls of others across the state.

Don’t put your phones down yet, however, as the bill may be considered at a later meeting or revised and brought forward again.  We are far from finished with this issue.  We will update you as soon as more information becomes available.  Meanwhile, savor this good news, and enjoy the statement below, from the ad hoc coalition working to defeat this bill. 

Thank you, thank you, PSC activists; organizing counts!

Barbara Bowen
 ______________________________________________________
In an extremely positive turn of events, Deborah Glick, chair of the NY State Assembly's Higher Education Committee, started that committee's meeting this afternoon by announcing that the anti-boycott legislation was being taken off the agenda! This meant that it was not discussed in either the Ways and Means or the Rules Committee today, and therefore is not going to the floor of the Assembly for a vote today. 

The organizations working to stop this dangerous assault on academic freedom and free speech want to thank all of you who made calls and sent emails to Albany. We heard from several sources that the phones were ringing off the hooks...your voices were heard!

Assembly Member Glick has said they will be re-working the legislation, so our work is not over yet. We do not know when that might happen or what a revised bill might include, but we'll do our best to keep everyone informed with the most up-to-date information.

The ad hoc group that has been working on this effort includes the Center for Constitutional Rights, the National Lawyers Guild, the Professional Staff Congress (PSC - CUNY faculty union), Jewish Voice for Peace, Jews Say No, the American Studies Association and others. In addition, very strong work came from NYSUT (NY State United Teachers), AAUP, NY Civil Liberties Union, and many individuals.

Thanks again to everyone who took action....it does make a difference!

Comments

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated just to make sure they are not spam! We aim to review and publish within 24 hours.

Popular posts from this blog

CUNY First Computer System to Aid Administrative Control over Colleges at the Expense of Efficiency and Effectiveness

Guest Post   Every once in a while I get a question, either privately or in a department meeting, regarding CUNYFirst. Here is what I know of CUNYFirst, based on a few years of working with the project as a "training liaison" (which is a fancy term for room-scheduler). (1) The idea of CUNYFirst is a good one: to have a unified, integrated "enterprise"-scale system that encompasses all university/campus business processes. Such a system could, in principle at least, have saved a lot of expenditure on maintaining dozens of disparate, redundant, barely cooperating third-party systems. Such a system could have offered information access that would have benefited the administration, the staff, the faculty, and students. (2) CUNY Central's motives in pursuing CUNYFirst were dominated by an agenda that has nothing to do with such benefits however. Rather, CUNY Central sought absolute control over all college activity, including curriculum. Think of it: whoev
Read more

CHAPTER LETTER CAMPAIGN: to President Michelle Anderson

Image
In the Fall of 2023, we asked all departments or units to write and sign letters to the college President, Michelle Anderson. We wanted her to know what our colleagues do well. We wanted her to hear our vision for work and mission at Brooklyn College. We wanted her to understand what we all need to thrive. We wanted to model a mission-driven discourse, not a workplace lead by austerity.  We wanted our President to hear us. Professor Naomi Braine reads the Sociology Dept Letter Professor Jillian Cavanaugh reads the Anthropology Letter     Twelve letters, signed by 100s of our colleagues were submitted—although many more were penned (many felt uneasy about being visible in this way). 1) Synthesis letter signed by over 80 faculty and staff 2) Sociology Department , 26 signatures 3) Anthropology Department, 16 signatures 4) Accounting Department , 14 signatures 5) Library , 28 signatures 6) PRLS , 6 signatures 7) Psychology Department , 30 signatures 8) English Department , over 100 signat
Read more

93% Vote No Confidence in Pathways

The referendum votes have been tallied: a total of 4,322 votes were cast, out of a total number of 7,202 possible votes: a 60% turnout. Of those, 3,996 full-time faculty agreed that they have No Confidence in Pathways, with only 323 voting Disagree (and 3 void ballots). An absolute majority of the full-time faculty are on record as having no confidence in Pathways. That is a stunning rebuke to the new curriculum and the coercive process used to implement it. I will send a longer message to the entire membership shortly, but for now I want to congratulate you all on your extraordinary collective effort in defense of our students' right to a rigorous education. Equipped with this result, we can take the campaign to a new level in the fall. In solidarity, Barbara Bowen
Read more