CUNY First Already Failing at BC

In another victory for administrative incompetence at CUNY Central, Brooklyn College faculty learned this week of another capability we used to have that CUNY First will eliminate. For the last several years BC faculty have been able to access student photos along with their class rosters. This feature is extremely useful in large class sections and some faculty even produce seating charts to help them remember student names more quickly. It can also be a big help when evaluating class participation.

CUNY First in its drive to commonality at the lowest common denominator cannot reproduce this function.

Perhaps more importantly, CUNY First will not produce rosters with the email addresses that students actually use, since it will only display official CUNY email address assigned to students when they are admitted. Since almost all entering students already have email addresses, this is extremely counterproductive.

To its credit ITS at Brooklyn College is developing a series of workarounds to preserve these services by funneling the CUNY First data back into the BC Portal. That means that for some things you’ll need to go to the Portal and for others CUNY First. For faculty this means more work, more confusion, and a less seamless experience of managing student data. The opposite of what we were promised by CUNY Central.

Finally, CUNY is still reporting that many students who log into CUNY First are seeing the logo of other colleges on their CUNY First start up page after they claim their CUNY First ID. This is because CUNY bought off the shelf software designed for others and has been desperately, and in many cases unsuccessfully, trying to adopt it to one of the largest and most complex university systems in the world. Why? So they can exert greater centralized control over curriculum, budgets, and student data. For more see our earlier post on CUNY First.

If you know about more failures with the CUNY First system, please let us know: PSCCUNYBC@gmail.com

Below is Mark Gold’s email to faculty:

CUNYfirst Class Rosters

The rosters available within CUNYfirst do not have student photos or alternate email addresses and CUNY has no timeline for enhancing them.

Since these are critical resources for BC faculty, ITS has worked to feed daily CUNYfirst data extracts to the BC Portal rosters.  The legacy rosters with photos and alternate email addresses are available on the WebCentral portal HOME page in the "My Teaching Schedule & Rosters" channel.  They are now available for Spring 2013, and will be available for Summer and Fall 2013.  Note that starting with Spring 2013, student EMPLID's have replaced the legacy SS #'s.

Please note that CUNY has just migrated hundreds of thousands of complex student records to a new system, where information is stored with new values and in new ways.  Our analysis indicates that the quality of the data we are receiving is good, but we fully expect to continue finding conversion issues for months to come.   If you think you see any anomalous or incorrect information on your rosters, please do not hesitate to alert me at mark@brooklyn.cuny.edu, so we can investigate.

Comments

  1. UnknownMay 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM

    The BC Portal is currently reporting: "CUNYfirst works best with Firefox v3.0 and later, Internet Explorer v7, 8, 9, and Safari v3,4,5. Do NOT use Google Chrome! Make sure your browser is set to allow pop-ups from the CUNYfirst site."

    That's right. CUNYfirst doesn't work with Chrome.

    So, CUNY adopts a enterprise management system that doesn't work on the most popular browser used today. Hmmm...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated just to make sure they are not spam! We aim to review and publish within 24 hours.

Popular posts from this blog

CUNY First Computer System to Aid Administrative Control over Colleges at the Expense of Efficiency and Effectiveness

Guest Post   Every once in a while I get a question, either privately or in a department meeting, regarding CUNYFirst. Here is what I know of CUNYFirst, based on a few years of working with the project as a "training liaison" (which is a fancy term for room-scheduler). (1) The idea of CUNYFirst is a good one: to have a unified, integrated "enterprise"-scale system that encompasses all university/campus business processes. Such a system could, in principle at least, have saved a lot of expenditure on maintaining dozens of disparate, redundant, barely cooperating third-party systems. Such a system could have offered information access that would have benefited the administration, the staff, the faculty, and students. (2) CUNY Central's motives in pursuing CUNYFirst were dominated by an agenda that has nothing to do with such benefits however. Rather, CUNY Central sought absolute control over all college activity, including curriculum. Think of it: whoev
Read more

CHAPTER LETTER CAMPAIGN: to President Michelle Anderson

Image
In the Fall of 2023, we asked all departments or units to write and sign letters to the college President, Michelle Anderson. We wanted her to know what our colleagues do well. We wanted her to hear our vision for work and mission at Brooklyn College. We wanted her to understand what we all need to thrive. We wanted to model a mission-driven discourse, not a workplace lead by austerity.  We wanted our President to hear us. Professor Naomi Braine reads the Sociology Dept Letter Professor Jillian Cavanaugh reads the Anthropology Letter     Twelve letters, signed by 100s of our colleagues were submitted—although many more were penned (many felt uneasy about being visible in this way). 1) Synthesis letter signed by over 80 faculty and staff 2) Sociology Department , 26 signatures 3) Anthropology Department, 16 signatures 4) Accounting Department , 14 signatures 5) Library , 28 signatures 6) PRLS , 6 signatures 7) Psychology Department , 30 signatures 8) English Department , over 100 signat
Read more

93% Vote No Confidence in Pathways

The referendum votes have been tallied: a total of 4,322 votes were cast, out of a total number of 7,202 possible votes: a 60% turnout. Of those, 3,996 full-time faculty agreed that they have No Confidence in Pathways, with only 323 voting Disagree (and 3 void ballots). An absolute majority of the full-time faculty are on record as having no confidence in Pathways. That is a stunning rebuke to the new curriculum and the coercive process used to implement it. I will send a longer message to the entire membership shortly, but for now I want to congratulate you all on your extraordinary collective effort in defense of our students' right to a rigorous education. Equipped with this result, we can take the campaign to a new level in the fall. In solidarity, Barbara Bowen
Read more