Voting Begins on Pathways No Confidence Referendum


May 8, 2013

Dear Colleague: 

Tomorrow, May 9, voting begins in the first No Confidence referendum in the union’s history. Don’t miss the chance to be part of it. A vote of No Confidence is historically the most profound rejection of political direction a voting body can deliver. If we have an overwhelming turnout and a large majority voting No Confidence, we reposition the faculty to demand that the incoming CUNY administration rethink and replace Pathways.

The referendum is about two things: the quality of a CUNY education and the professional authority of faculty in decisions on curriculum. We take a major step toward reclaiming both if we deliver a resounding vote of No Confidence. [Click here to find out how to vote.] 

The success of the referendum depends on you. Don’t sit this one out. Don’t disregard it because you feel you have already voiced your opposition to Pathways. This vote is different. A definitive result will allow us to go to the new Interim Chancellor—and to the public—with incontrovertible proof that the full-time faculty does not support Pathways and that we demand an alternative. Other expressions of opposition continue to be important: the lawsuits against Pathways are finally starting to move through the courts, and the union continues to work with faculty governance to uphold motions of opposition to Pathways. But the referendum is a strategic vote at a strategic moment. For the sake of your students, your colleagues and yourself, take the opportunity to participate.

Each of us has a stake in Pathways, whatever discipline, professional field or level of courses we teach. Pathways will determine the quality of the educational foundation CUNY students receive and the quality of the curriculum in the academic majors. It will determine whether the thousands of CUNY students who come to college under-prepared meet a rich and demanding curriculum that gives them a second chance—or a curriculum that reinforces their history of being shortchanged by the education system.

Each of us has a stake in reclaiming control of curriculum. A university where the curriculum is not developed and overseen by its faculty is hardly a university.  Pathways is an attempt to strip the faculty of agency, just as teachers in the public schools have been deprofessionalized.

Ballots are being mailed today, and voting begins tomorrow. Participating is simple, and your vote will be completely anonymous. It is shameful that we have to worry about intimidation in a university, but the coercion that has been exercised around Pathways shows that we do; and the secret ballot will allow you to vote without fear. The ballot contains one sentence: “I have No Confidence in Pathways.” As a voter, you can indicate “Agree” or “Disagree.” By casting your vote—and by voting “Agree”—you will help to reclaim the curriculum and the professional authority of the faculty.
We don’t have a minute to lose. I urge you to vote as soon as your ballot arrives.

In solidarity,
Barbara Bowen
President, PSC/CUNY

Comments

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated just to make sure they are not spam! We aim to review and publish within 24 hours.

Popular posts from this blog

CUNY First Computer System to Aid Administrative Control over Colleges at the Expense of Efficiency and Effectiveness

Guest Post   Every once in a while I get a question, either privately or in a department meeting, regarding CUNYFirst. Here is what I know of CUNYFirst, based on a few years of working with the project as a "training liaison" (which is a fancy term for room-scheduler). (1) The idea of CUNYFirst is a good one: to have a unified, integrated "enterprise"-scale system that encompasses all university/campus business processes. Such a system could, in principle at least, have saved a lot of expenditure on maintaining dozens of disparate, redundant, barely cooperating third-party systems. Such a system could have offered information access that would have benefited the administration, the staff, the faculty, and students. (2) CUNY Central's motives in pursuing CUNYFirst were dominated by an agenda that has nothing to do with such benefits however. Rather, CUNY Central sought absolute control over all college activity, including curriculum. Think of it: whoev
Read more

CHAPTER LETTER CAMPAIGN: to President Michelle Anderson

Image
In the Fall of 2023, we asked all departments or units to write and sign letters to the college President, Michelle Anderson. We wanted her to know what our colleagues do well. We wanted her to hear our vision for work and mission at Brooklyn College. We wanted her to understand what we all need to thrive. We wanted to model a mission-driven discourse, not a workplace lead by austerity.  We wanted our President to hear us. Professor Naomi Braine reads the Sociology Dept Letter Professor Jillian Cavanaugh reads the Anthropology Letter     Twelve letters, signed by 100s of our colleagues were submitted—although many more were penned (many felt uneasy about being visible in this way). 1) Synthesis letter signed by over 80 faculty and staff 2) Sociology Department , 26 signatures 3) Anthropology Department, 16 signatures 4) Accounting Department , 14 signatures 5) Library , 28 signatures 6) PRLS , 6 signatures 7) Psychology Department , 30 signatures 8) English Department , over 100 signat
Read more

93% Vote No Confidence in Pathways

The referendum votes have been tallied: a total of 4,322 votes were cast, out of a total number of 7,202 possible votes: a 60% turnout. Of those, 3,996 full-time faculty agreed that they have No Confidence in Pathways, with only 323 voting Disagree (and 3 void ballots). An absolute majority of the full-time faculty are on record as having no confidence in Pathways. That is a stunning rebuke to the new curriculum and the coercive process used to implement it. I will send a longer message to the entire membership shortly, but for now I want to congratulate you all on your extraordinary collective effort in defense of our students' right to a rigorous education. Equipped with this result, we can take the campaign to a new level in the fall. In solidarity, Barbara Bowen
Read more